If you criticise Israel...

@ed01106 said in #3:
> You can criticize Israel without being an anti-Semite.
>
> But if you seek to deny Israel the right to defend itself against a terrorist organization with the stated goal of genocide all Israelis then you are an anti-Semite.
I want a rational explanation for the Zionists' "self defense" against Palestinians civilians from your part. People as wealthy as Zionists apparently "needs to defend itself against a terrorist organisation" but fails to distinguish between a Hamas fighter and a civilian.

@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #7:
> Try reading what I write instead of ... whatever it is you do.
>
> My logic is like this:
>
> If you want Israel destroyed and blame the jews of the entire world for Israel's wrongdoings, then you are an anti-semite.
That's the thing, we blame the Zionist jews and any Zionist who believes in killing civilians to make a state, not in every jew. There are jews who don't accept Zionism.

When it's Israel's genocide, it's "bad stuff" and "wrongdoings", but when it's about Hamas' attack, it's "terrorism" and "antisemitism". Blind support for a racist supremacy like "Israel".

> Since nazis were like the number one anti-semite movement in my part of the world, I'll call you a nazi as well.
On what basis do you suppose all who you talk to are like Hitler who want to kill jews for his pleasure?!?

> K now you're just STRAIGHT UP LYING about what I write. Why do you do that?
I bare witness for all your lies that you posted on your part in the past, from obvious lies to biased analogies. What stops me from not believing you based on your past false statements?

> It's odd why you'd want to do that.
Reread what you read with the context of this reply, and tell me again it's odd why I'd want to do that.

@sdkman said in #18:
> Did you miss the part of mutual respect

Original Poster started the game and I miss the part of mututal respect in the original post

@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #7:
> Try reading what I write instead of ... whatever it is you do.
What you write is: someone talks about the idf in a bad way, you: I know you do not say it but I know in your mind because I have magical powers and can read minds that you hate jews
It just that I know
> My logic is like this:
> If you want Israel destroyed and blame the jews of the entire world for Israel's wrongdoings, then you are an anti-semite.
Wrongdoings: even the language shows you support the idf
Literally you got like: hamas doing abominations monstereous things they are monsters, for the idf you say: wrongdoings, such a "cute" world to talk about the death of 20k person
I say free Palestine from river to the sea, am I anti Semitic for saying that?
> Since nazis were like the number one anti-semite movement in my part of the world, I'll call you a nazi as well.
Nazis hated all races not only jews
They started by jews and after they would finish they would have probably attacked and erased other races
We all condemn what the Nazis did but you accuse us of being of them
With the pretext that you know that we hate jews, somehow mind reading

@sdkman
I mean, good luck on the whole taking all of Judea back thing (we're not using colonizer names for it right?)

It's a wholly impractical antagonizing goal that pushes a real possibility for peace just as much out of reach as does Israelis government behavior.

And it makes Netanyahu's job SOOOOOOO disgustingly easy it makes me really despise the rhetoric used, because their right-wing only thrives on the support it has right now because people are taking the whole - easily translated into 'let's kill all the Israeli's' rhetoric seriously.

It's just difficult to watch because you're really just shooting yourselves in the foot, over and over - and it's sad. So many times.

@sdkman said in #26:

> I say free Palestine from river to the sea, am I anti Semitic for saying that?
"Free" could mean any number of things.
I assume you are referring to this?
From the river to the sea/Palestine will be free
It's not a bad saying. But it overgeneralizes things a bit - since we don't know how exactly this plan is to be carried out.
This saying basically says that there will be no Israel. After all, where would you make an Israel if the whole Palestine is from the river to the sea?
I don't think it's necessarily antisemitic, but again, depends on how you plan on freeing Palestine.
If it's through giving everyone a choice of either submitting to the new government or leaving, I'd call that antisemitic, because it basically promotes another nakba again.
Nothing wrong with criticizing Israel though. We all know that both Palestine and Israel are not perfect, and I don't see why anyone should make them out to be. The key lies in realizing this, and then not jumping to conclusions right away. :)
Israel has done monstrous things, and so has Palestine. Trying to justify everything, from either side, is never going to help.

@twighead small question, where? In all the posts I made...just where? Where did I say kill all zionists???

@sdkman said in #29:
> @twighead small question, where? In all the posts I made...just where? Where did I say kill all zionists???
You didn't - I'm saying that's how the rhetoric of 'from river to sea' and other slogans are interpreted by the Israeli govt