@PatrickJames84 said in #40:
> I’m not questioning your rights. I’m questioning the validity of you telling these people what their jobs are.
If you're going to gaslight people, you should do it when there isn't a log of comments available to read. You told me I can go elsewhere and skip commenting. It's unfortunate you aren't willing to discuss things with people you disagree with in good faith, but I guess that's how people engaged in group think operate.
I couldnt care less, but i can imagine your concerns, BECAUSE you are french and reside in France.
But if any other national chess federation was to take such a decision (like preferring another chess site to partner with), we would just shrug one's shoulders and go on. Everybody is making bad decisions once in a while, so what?
They will eventuelly discover the errors of their ways and rectify the decision after due time.
So go on doing, what you have been doing best till present time, and be patient. There is not a problem - as far as i can see -.
If lichess is the 2nd biggest Chess website worldwide, what is the biggest? chess.c*m?
@Wassailing said in #41:
> If you're going to gaslight people, you should do it when there isn't a log of comments available to read. You told me I can go elsewhere and skip commenting. It's unfortunate you aren't willing to discuss things with people you disagree with in good faith, but I guess that's how people engaged in group think operate.
What I said was that anybody who doesn’t like lichess’s decision has the right to (not must) go elsewhere and anyone who just doesn’t care about politics can (again, not must) skip commenting. I did not once ever tell you you shouldn’t post your opinion. Arguing in good faith requires an actual argument of fact, not an assertion that someone should just shut up and do their job. What you did was tell lichess they should skip commenting and just play chess. That’s really the only part of your comment I took any umbrage toward. The very thing you don’t like about what you perceived I said was the core of what you said in the first place. If you had only said that the FFE may not want to partner with lichess because lichess may withdraw support/services over political issues that would have made complete sense and I wouldn’t have commented at all.
@Metagross31 said in #43:
> If lichess is the 2nd biggest Chess website worldwide, what is the biggest?
chess.com/?
yes
@Wassailing said in #37:
> True. I can tell by the seething replies that I am 100% correct. I guess I never had to guess after all.
>
> Imagine being reddit personified. Couldn't be me.
>
> I'm not violating their tos and I have every right to call them out for being dumb. Just like the French Federation has a right to not use their website.
Gross. Just... gross.
Given the concerns raised, it might be in the best interest of the community for the French Federation to provide more clarity and detailed information about the partnership and its potential implications for the chess community.
ChatGPT 4.0 response based on my interactions:
Certainly, a crypto-based platform can offer a range of advantages over traditional or even open-source platforms. If the French Federation and Immortal Game choose to advocate for the use of a crypto-based platform, they could highlight the following potential benefits:
Pros of a Crypto-based Platform:
1. Monetization and Tokenomics: Cryptocurrencies can provide a unique way to monetize online platforms through tokenomics, where tokens have a particular utility within the platform ecosystem. This can create incentives for users to participate more actively and can also lead to value appreciation for active and early users.
2. Decentralization: Blockchain, the underlying technology of most cryptocurrencies, allows for decentralized systems where control is not vested in a single entity. This can lead to more democratic or user-controlled platforms.
3. Transparency: Transactions on blockchain are immutable and transparent. If applied to game outcomes, player rankings, or other relevant data, this can increase trust in the platform's fairness and integrity.
4. Digital Asset Ownership: Integration with NFTs (non-fungible tokens) can provide users with verifiable ownership of digital assets, like unique chess pieces, boards, or even in-game achievements. This can add a new dimension to the gaming experience.
5. Global Payments: Cryptocurrencies can streamline payments, especially for international users. They can lower transaction fees, speed up transaction times, and provide access to users who might not have traditional bank accounts.
6. Innovation and Modernity: By integrating with the crypto ecosystem, the platform can position itself at the cutting edge of technology, potentially attracting tech-savvy users and those interested in the intersection of chess and modern tech.
7. Security:*Blockchain technology, when implemented correctly, is known for its robust security. This could mean added security for user data and transactions.
Addressing Concerns for Young Users:
The French Federation and Immortal Game would also need to adopt and highlight measures to protect younger users, such as:
1. Education: Offering resources, tutorials, and information on safe crypto practices.
2. Age Restrictions: Implementing age checks or parental controls for financial transactions.
3. Spending Limits: Implementing caps on how much a user can spend or transact within a certain timeframe.
4. Clear Communication: Clearly outlining the risks and ensuring that users (especially younger ones) are making informed decisions.
5. Feedback Mechanisms: Allowing for community feedback and adapting to concerns as they arise.
In conclusion, while crypto-based platforms offer various potential advantages, they also come with new challenges and risks, especially for younger users. A balanced approach that highlights the benefits while actively addressing and mitigating risks would be crucial for the success and acceptance of such a platform in the chess community.
The article was updated to include Mathilde Choisy's stance, former Director-General of the federation, questioning the legality of the partnership, which is possibly breaking the French Consumer Protection laws.
@PatrickJames84 said in #44:
There's really no point in discussing things any further since you now are not only lying about your own words, but mine as well. Good luck with that.
The problem with Lichess is that it is a political group masked as a chess site instead of
chess.com, which is a chess site. Lichess, you really need to stay out of political and religious events. THAT IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF CHESS PLAYERS. Otherwise, please make your case about how being communist, BLM, or LGBT against Russians is in the best interest of chess players. I am not saying that to support those groups is wrong is just not the right place for a chess site. People in the lichess organization are commingling their personal views with the site.
